Penn ethicist proposes new category for psychiatric patients to justify instances of compulsory treatment

The ‘involuntary treatment’ of unwilling psychiatric patients has long been accepted as necessary in some cases, for the sake of patients and society, though it can raise serious ethical concerns as well as legal barriers. In a Viewpoint essay published online today in JAMA, ethicist Dominic Sisti, PhD, argues that some of the concerns about treating patients without their consent would be alleviated if the mental health profession recognized an important distinction among these cases.
Go to Source